Roles and Responsibilities
A primary function of the conjunctive water management framework is to identify who does what, where and how. It seeks to clarify and recognise the scales of involvement and complementary roles for participants at catchment and regional levels, and within Commonwealth, State and Territory, and local government in Australia. These roles are not new or constructed, but they are a reflection of existing and emerging roles.
The framework also promotes strong and effective partnerships between the various stakeholder groups in the catchment. Such partnerships are needed for conjunctive water management to become an effective tool for achieving integrated water management goals and bringing practical benefits to water users.
Role of Water Users
The framework enables water users to view their activities in a catchment sense. Users can support the progressing of conjunctive water management through:
- representation of local (community and environmental) needs and objectives;
- development of locally applicable conjunctive water management options (eg water trade);
- identifying potential trade-offs (eg less water if there are more licence flexibilities) at the regional level;
- management options that reflect an understanding of how communities will be affected by different options (local environment and socio-economics); and
- local critique and quality assurance to technical outputs (eg identifying where poor reporting/monitoring of water usage may skew resource modelling) (Fullagar, 2004).
Role of catchment and regional groups
Catchments and regions are increasingly recognised as the most appropriate operational scale for managing natural resource issues. Governments have focused on this scale to achieve tangible environmental improvements over the medium to longer term. Examples include the Murray-Darling Basin Commission (MDBC) Integrated Catchment Management Strategy and a range of regional-specific State plans and strategies which have been funded through NAP and NHT. As a result, most efforts at natural resource management priority setting and monitoring are being undertaken at the catchment level.
Catchment planning should be based on the best available science and be inclusive of the needs of the community that lives within the region or catchment. It should also be responsive to the expectations of the communities that live outside. Catchment groups can:
- participate in catchment conjunctive water planning that is cooperative, makes effective use of best science information, is inclusive of all stakeholders, and fully integrates social, economic and environmental objectives;
- support the delivery of community-agreed objectives for integrated groundwater-surface water management outcomes;
- support capacity-building activities and ensure the necessary resources are in place to enable goals to be met;
- form strategic partnerships and encourage industry to participate in and deliver on planning processes and outcomes for conjunctive water management;
- actively seek information and support from reliable sources (including relevant biophysical and economic expertise) and apply it to the catchment water resources planning and management process;
- prepare catchment integrated water management plans in sufficient detail to enable private landholders to link to catchment-scale outcomes; and
- regularly monitor and publish the progress towards meeting catchment goals and objectives.
The framework enables landholders to view their farm-based activities in a catchment sense. It enables communities to be confident in regional water planning and its ability to address broad national issues of integrated water management and natural resource management outcomes.
Role of governments
The conjunctive water management framework is consistent with the objectives of the National Water Initiative (NWI). The NWI was brought about by governments recognising that water availability has always been important in Australian life and management of water resources is extremely challenging. The initiative foreshadows expanded water trading across State borders, increased security of water entitlements for land owners, introduction of new arrangements for environmental flows and greater recognition of the connectivity between surface water and groundwater resources. The framework seeks to build on these existing water resources management initiatives and to facilitate the development and implementation of conjunctive water management.
Australian, State and Territory governments share a range of roles that support conjunctive water management. The role of governments should be consistent with existing legislation and with intergovernmental initiatives, such as the NWI and other water reforms. This is the case even for activities that do not rely on legislation. Assessment against National Competition Policy principles is useful in considering whether government intervention is applied in a consistent manner that does not impinge on private enterprise.
Table 1 summarises the proposed roles of governments into five main categories:
- providing and facilitating water user access to education and information on conjunctive water management;
- coordination;
- developing integrated water management policy;
- research and development; and
- monitoring and evaluation.
There are also some roles that are unique to a particular sphere of government depending on the responsibilities and scale at which the action is needed, for example:
The Australian Government has a strong role in:
- providing leadership, coordination and support through a mixture of policies and incentives to drive the widespread adoption of conjunctive water management;
- supporting regional bodies to engage water users to contribute to integrated water management that supports natural resource and environmental outcomes;
- promoting a consistent intergovernmental approach to conjunctive water management in agriculture that is consistent with major natural resource policy direction in other sectors such as mining, fisheries, forestry and urban;
- assessing and supporting national natural resource management priorities;
- promoting a coordinated approach to conjunctive water management across industry sectors;
- assessing the impact on water resources and management of decisions in other policy sectors (such as immigration, defence, transport, regional development);
- actively participating in water resource issues that cross jurisdictional boundaries; and
- promoting Australia's approach within the international water arena.
State and Territory governments, with constitutional responsibility for water resource management, are in a primary position to influence natural resource management at the catchment level and to support integrated water management by:
- providing leadership and support through a mixture of State water policies and incentives to drive the widespread adoption of conjunctive water management;
- provide research and development support to primary producers for designing more sustainable production systems and practices;
- supporting regional bodies to engage water users to contribute to landscape natural resource and environmental outcomes through integrated water management linked to sufficiently detailed natural resource management plans;
- assessment of, and support for, state and regional natural resource management priorities; and
- working across state boundaries where catchments dictate.
Local governments are the sphere of government 'closest to the people' and can facilitate the voluntary adoption of conjunctive water management by:
- acting as local information brokers for community and landholders on conjunctive water management;
- being a local facilitator and advocate by providing meeting rooms, secretarial support, administrative support and facilitating negotiations;
- assessing and supporting local natural resource management priorities and working with regional and catchment bodies to enable them to link conjunctive water management to landscape natural resource and environmental outcomes; and
- where agreed and resourced, providing infrastructure or undertaking capital works to support local actions and changed management practices arising from integrated water management plans.
References
Fullagar I, 2004. Rivers and Aquifers: Towards conjunctive water management. Workshop Proceedings, Adelaide 6-7 May, 2004. Bureau of Rural Sciences.
| Australian Government | State/Territory governments | Local governments |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Education and information | ||
|
|
|
| 2. Coordination | ||
|
|
|
| 3. Facilitation | ||
|
|
|
| 4. Conjunctive water management policy development | ||
|
|
|
| 5. Research and Development | ||
|
|
|